Scientists have developed a new
robot teacher that can detect whether children are distracted in class and accordingly
respond to encourage them. Researchers at the Department of Artificial
Intelligence in Madrid have developed an integrated computational architecture
(Artie) for use with software applications in schools. The main goal of this
work was to design a system that can detect the emotional state of primary
school children interacting with educational software and make pedagogic interventions
with a robot tutor that can ultimately improve the learning experience. Rather than
focusing on specific emotions, the researchers first identified three cognitive
states (concentrating, distracted and inactive) known to influence the course
of learning. Keyboard strokes and mouse actions of children using educational
software were used to predict which of these cognitive states the child is
experiencing and subsequently linked to an algorithm that chooses the correct
form of pedagogic intervention. These could be words and gestures of
encouragement or attempts to raise interest and motivation for a specific
learning objective, all of which can be delivered by a robot tutor.
Sunday, 6 November 2016
A Way To Spot False FB Posts, Tweets
Scientists have developed a new
method for spotting people who post false reviews or tweets from multiple
social media accounts to espouse opinions. Researchers from the University of
Texas have devised a statistical method that analyses multiple writing samples –
a practice known as “astroturfing”. They found that it was challenging for
authors to completely conceal their writing style in their text. Based on word
choice, punctuation and context, the method was able to detect whether one
person or multiple people were responsible for the samples. Researchers used
writhing samples from online commenter’s on news websites and discovered that
many people espousing their opinions online were all linked to a few singular
writers with multiple accounts. Astroturfing is legal, but it is questionable
ethically. The practice has been used by businesses to manipulate social media
users by having one paid associate posts false reviews on sites about products
for sale. Politicians have also been accused of astroturfing to create the
illusion of public support for a campaign. Former US President George Bush,
Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump have been accused of astroturfing.
Onion Compound May Treat Ovarian Cancer
A natural compound isolated from
onions may help ovarian cancer, a new study has claimed. Researchers from
Kumamoto University in Japan studied the effects of onionin A (ONA) on a
preclinical model of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) both in vivo and in vitro.
Previously, researchers found that ONA suppressed pro-tumour activation of host
myeloid cells. According to WHO, EOC is the most common type ovarian cancer and
has a five year survival rate of about 40%. The group’s in vitro experiments
showed that EOCs which usually proliferate in the presence of pro tumour M2
macrophages, showed inhibited growth after introduction of ONA. This was
thought to be due to ONA influence of STAT3, a transcription factor known to be
involved in both M2 polarization and cancer cell proliferation. The team also
found that ONA inhibited the pro-tumour function of myeloid-derived suppressor
cells, which are associated with the suppression of the anti-tumour immune
response of host lymphocytes, by using preclinical sarcoma model. ONA was also
found to enhance the effects of anti-cancer drugs by strengthening their
anti-proliferation capabilities.
Robots Can Almost Replace Judges
Courtrooms could soon have robots
as judges, after scientists managed to develop an artificial intelligence (AI)
system capable of predicting verdicts with 79% accuracy. The artificially
intelligent judges were able to look at legal evidence as well as consider
ethical questions to decide how a case should be resolved. The algorithm looked
at data sets of 584 cases relating to torture and degrading treatment, fair
trials and privacy. The computer was able to look through that information and
make its own decision – which lined up with those made by Europe’s most senior judges
in almost every case. The researchers said that the computer judge wasn’t likely
to take the place of judges any time soon. But it could be used to help them
out – prioritizing cases that are important or nee dot be heard, for instance. Researchers
said they don’t see AI replacing judges or lawyers, but they’d find it useful
for rapidly identifying patterns in cases that lead to certain outcomes. It could
also be a valuable tool for highlighting which cases are most likely to be
violations of the European Convention on Human Rights. The researchers found
that during the creation of the programme the judges of European Court of Human
Rights tended to look more at non-legal factors than the strictly legal
arguments made in the case. In law, that puts the judges in the camp of “realists”
rather than “formalists” and fits with other courts like the US Supreme Court. The
developers were able to use information like that to find that the court’s
decisions relied largely on the kind of language used as well as what topics
were mentioned in the court texts. Previous studies have predicted outcomes
based on the nature of the crime, or the policy position of each judge. This is
the first time judgments have been predicted using analysis of text prepared by
the court.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)